Mortgage Bail Out Proposal to Aid Sub Prime Crisis

Okay, so the bailout is a proposal. 

And the problem I see, is that if the borrower’s payment is $2800 and the recast payment is supposed to be $4200, who is absorbing (loosing)  the $1400 monthly or $16,800 annually? (not counting interest). 

Is it the lender? Is it the government (taxpayer)? Or is it the “entity” that purchased the loan and currently owns it?  Or will it be added to the homeowner's loan balance... and the borrower will just have more negative amortization. I think, they better “think” again.

Oh, and the above payment example is an "actually recast" from someone who called me to discuss their situation.  If interest rates don't change their $2800 monthly will be $4200 next October. That's their recast.

If you are a homeowner in this situation:  there is a toll free number to call 888-995-HOPE

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.